[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 4, Issue 14 (5-2015) ::
کیمیای هنر 2015, 4(14): 21-30 Back to browse issues page
A Comparison between Purposiveness in Introduction and Third Moment and its Results
Saeed Hajrashidian *, Ali Salmani
Abstract:   (5359 Views)
One of Kant’s basic concern in the critique of judgment is teleology. Purpose as subject of investigation in Aristotle and his followers was completely put aside in the justification of world by the modern philosophers such as Descartes and Spinoza. Kant as the leader of modern philosophy in the Critique of Judgment again comes back to purpose and purposiveness. He believes that teleology is the principle of reflective faculty of judgment. This paper concerns with this problem that whether the concept of teleology, raised with metaphysical tint from the start, has any connection with purpose and purposiveness in the third moment or not? If this connection is proved, what will its results be?
Keywords: Kant, beauty, teleology, purpose, purposiveness
Full-Text [PDF 295 kb]   (2885 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2015/07/12 | Accepted: 2015/07/12
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hajrashidian S, Salmani A. A Comparison between Purposiveness in Introduction and Third Moment and its Results. کیمیای هنر. 2015; 4 (14) :21-30
URL: http://kimiahonar.ir/article-1-332-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 14 (5-2015) Back to browse issues page
Kimiya-ye-Honar
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4341