[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
About ARIA::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Reviewers::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN: 2251-8630
 e-ISSN: 2251-9971
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 57 (Winter 2026) ::
کیمیای هنر 2026, 14(57): 85-104 Back to browse issues page
A Derridean Deconstructive Analysis of the Scapegoat Myth in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible
Ahmadreza Majdnia , Nader Shayganfar * , Behrouz Soheili Esfahani
Art University of Isfahan
Abstract:   (7 Views)
      The scapegoating mechanism has long served as a tool for reproducing social order through the expulsion of evil beyond the boundaries of the community. A deconstructive rereading of this mechanism reveals profound complexities and semantic instabilities. The works of Arthur Miller maintain a close interconnection with the social, cultural, and political relations of the early decades of the twentieth century. Therefore, interpreting these works-particularly from a deconstructive perspective-can facilitate a deeper understanding of power dynamics, truth, victimization, and modern ethics in the specific historical conditions of this era. Among Miller's oeuvre, the play The Crucible notably focuses on victimization and the processes of accusation and resultant social exclusion. Hence, selecting this text for deconstructing the concept of the scapegoat holds twofold significance. The present study, drawing upon Jacques Derrida's perspectives, endeavors to subject this play to semantic deconstruction. Concentrating on Derrida's key concepts-such as pharmakon, trace, différance, hymen, and undecidability-this investigation deconstructs the foundational opposition of inside/outside in the myth of the scapegoat within the play, seeking to address the question: How does the application of scapegoating in the aforementioned literary text, in light of Derridean deconstructive concepts, become subject to semantic suspension and undecidability? The results indicate that the position of the scapegoat oscillates in semantic suspension and deferral among the characters (Tituba, Abigail, Proctor) and within the city's structure itself, leading to the collapse of binary boundaries between guilt/innocence and truth/falsehood in a hysterical space. The research findings further suggest that the scapegoat operates beyond a mere ostracized victim, functioning as a constitutive, destructive, and simultaneously revelatory element for meaning. The scapegoat resides in a liminal and slippery position-not entirely inside nor absolutely outside the structure but suspended on the unstable threshold of binary oppositions.
Keywords: Deconstruction, Jacques Derrida, Scapegoat, Pharmakon, The Crucible play, Inside/Outside Binary Opposition
Full-Text [PDF 547 kb]   (4 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2025/11/30 | Accepted: 2026/05/24
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Majdnia A, Shayganfar N, Soheili Esfahani B. A Derridean Deconstructive Analysis of the Scapegoat Myth in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. کیمیای هنر 2026; 14 (57) :85-104
URL: http://kimiahonar.ir/article-1-2493-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 57 (Winter 2026) Back to browse issues page
Kimiya-ye-Honar
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.03 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741