[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
About ARIA::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Reviewers::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN: 2251-8630
 e-ISSN: 2251-9971
..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 2 results for Authenticity

Ahmad Ali Heidari, Muhammad Sadegh Sadeghipour,
Volume 2, Issue 9 (3-2014)
Abstract

In this essay, the phenomena of Fear and Angst/Anxiety are analyzed according to Martin Heidegger's thought only to prove that this significant field is defined as a range of inauthentic fear toward authentic angst/anxiety and it is revealed as »happening of truth« or strife between world and earth, in Film world? Monster, as embodiment of evil and constitutive pivotal element of Horror Cinema, is manifested in various appearances of phenomenon of fear. Horror Cinema via projecting fundamental elements of Heidegger's hermeneutic analysis (i.e. world, death, guilt, projection, authenticity and inauthenticity) in relation to Dasein in terms of a cinematic expression, makes the disclosure of »happening of truth« in the film world possible via audience contribution, as an interpreter Dasein engaged in this world, and the revealed »happening of truth« in this Cinema is phenomenon of Fear and grounding attunement of angst/anxiety which is uncovered in a cinematic world.
Marjaneh Souzankar, Mohammadreza Rikhtegaran, Shamsolmolouk Mostafavi,
Volume 9, Issue 37 (1-2021)
Abstract

In Being and Time Heidegger believes that Dasein is the only being who has existence, he also argues Dasein has two existential modes: authenticity and in-authenticity. inauthenticity is usual Dasein’s existence, A way of Being in which Dasein has strayed away of himself and has fallen into the chaos of others. In this way of Being he deals to beings as others do, just in terms of efficiency and benefits. Although Heidegger considers in-authenticity as often way of Dasein’s Being but another way is possible. He calls another way of Dasein’s Being, authenticity. In this type Dasiesn transcendences from usual Being. In his later thought, Heidegger attributes authenticity and inauthenticity to different revealing of Being. In this view, Art and Technicque are two important status of revealing. So perhaps Art and Technic could be regarded as two determinative domains of Dasein’s Being.


Page 1 from 1     

Kimiya-ye-Honar
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 28 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714