[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
About ARIA::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Reviewers::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN: 2251-8630
 e-ISSN: 2251-9971
..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 2 results for Abject

Rima Eslammaslak, Narges Haririan,
Volume 5, Issue 20 (11-2016)
Abstract

The depiction and presentation of abnormal figures and wounded, mutilated and sickly bodies is a trend in contemporary figurative art. This trend is known as “abject art”. In the world of art, this title was first used in an exhibition of figurative works by contemporary artists in New York’s Whitney Museum. Of course, the depiction of the abject and abjection is not exclusive to contemporary art and can also be seen in the paintings left for us from the sixteenth century. But the first use of these words in philosophical discourse belongs to the year 1982, i.e. when Julia Kristeva, a contemporary philosopher, psychoanalyst and linguist used it in her article “Powers of Horror, an Essay on Abjection”. Abject art is born of the crisis of modern art; it is born of the wars, destruction, diseases and powers that target humanity and its’ fate. Studying the idea of abjection in the discourse of Julia Kristeva and its reflection in contemporary life and art is the main goal of this endeavor. To reach this goal, information has been collected from documents and is presented in a descriptive-analytical manner. Kristeva searches for the roots of abjection in childhood: the time when the seed of all that is identified as identity in humans, germinates in the shadow of the desire to be different. The desire to differ oneself from that which is simultaneously both in contrast to and part of his being, a desire that never leads to a complete separation. Abjection accompanies hate and violence and not only makes identity, but also endangers it. 


Somaieh Shahrokhi, Manzar Mohammadi,
Volume 13, Issue 52 (12-2024)
Abstract

     The use of clothing in art can serve as a powerful metaphor for the body. Bodies, when depicted with impurities resulting from violence, can evoke feelings of disgust and awareness in the audience. This article examines the works of Doris Salcedo, Christian Boltanski, and Anselm Kiefer, exploring how they utilize "clothing" as a representation of "bodies" to critique "violence."These artists employ clothing as a symbolic tool to represent violence in their works. By analyzing the diverse ways in which they utilize clothing, this article seeks to answer the following question: How can Julia Kristeva's concept of abjection be applied to analyze the works of Salcedo, Boltanski, and Kiefer, which utilize clothing as a tool for critiquing violence and representing loss, death, and violence? In the works of these artists, clothing serves as a metaphor for lost bodies. The abject theory, rooted in the rebellion of borders and systems and deeply connected to the visceral body, provides a compelling framework for understanding this representation.


Page 1 from 1     

Kimiya-ye-Honar
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 28 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714