[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
About ARIA::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Reviewers::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISSN: 2251-8630
 e-ISSN: 2251-9971
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 54 (Spring 2025) ::
کیمیای هنر 2025, 14(54): 17-33 Back to browse issues page
The Exposition of Ugliness and Its Relation to the Judgment of Taste in Kant’s Philosophical System Based on the Interpretations of His Commentators
Somayeh Ramezanmahi *
Soore University
Abstract:   (76 Views)
During the flourishing of the Enlightenment, Kant attributed to beauty an identity distinct from morality and reason, elaborating on its various dimensions. In the Critique of Judgment, by examining judgments of taste, Kant delineates the boundary between the beautiful and the sublime and elucidates their independent role in attaining universal cognition. However, he remains silent on the concept of ugliness. Given that the embodiment of ugliness occupies a significant portion of artistic works, this article seeks to critique and analyze the role of ugliness in achieving universal cognition within Kantian aesthetics, as interpreted by his commentators. Employing a qualitative, descriptive-analytical methodology and drawing on library and documentary sources, this study addresses the following question: What is the relationship between ugliness and universal cognition from a Kantian perspective?
     The findings indicate that while there are two divergent interpretations among Kantian commentators, the conceptualization of ugliness can be grounded in a more profound negation. Accordingly, negative judgments of taste belong to the category of reflective aesthetic judgments and can be analyzed through the fourfold structure of judgments of taste as follows: Quality: Displeasure devoid of interest (interesselose Unlust), Quantity: Equivalent to universal validity, Relation: Counter-purposiveness (Zweckwidrigkeit) without a purpose, Modality: Necessarily displeasing. Thus, ugliness embodies a negative purposiveness that generates a discordant free play between the faculties of imagination and understanding. Although more complex, this dissonance may ultimately aspire to harmony.

 
Keywords: Aesthetic Judgment, Ugliness, Beauty, Critique of Judgment, Immanuel Kant
Full-Text [PDF 540 kb]   (41 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/12/5 | Accepted: 2025/04/29
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ramezanmahi S. The Exposition of Ugliness and Its Relation to the Judgment of Taste in Kant’s Philosophical System Based on the Interpretations of His Commentators. کیمیای هنر 2025; 14 (54) :17-33
URL: http://kimiahonar.ir/article-1-2375-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 54 (Spring 2025) Back to browse issues page
Kimiya-ye-Honar
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714